Thematic areas of the symposium1. Categorisation of minor(i)sed languages
The terminology itself, and in particular its abundance arises from many situations which seek to describe and also need to be questioned, or at least it needs to be clarified- Is a ‘language of belonging” (Defays, 2018) a “language of identification”? (Fabà Prats and Torres-Pla, 2019). These notions can be rooted in several areas: the Humanities and Social Sciences - particularly in law. Languages can also be viewed as legal objects, in terms of selecting one or more official/ national languages and/or the (non)-recognition of others. Considered elements of nation/group identification, they have legal consequences (teaching, administrative communication language, etc..) and set down a major challenge for States. There is still not much legal work on these issues( Bertile, 2008), so it is worth highlighting this aspect.
Papers will focus on (non-exhaustive list):
2. Minor(i)sed language transmission A language can only exist if it is transmitted. The interrogations relating to transmission/sharing are therefore critical in the case of endangered languages. This section will focus on some issues relating to acquisition, teaching and learning (taking into account Barzotto’s(2004) proposal to integrate various linguistics behaviours from students. Alongside, the standardised and formalised language, language policies and family language policies (Haque, 2019), or the place of the standard (Andión & Gil, 2013), and also, the consideration of polynomiality (Ottavi, 2010) at the didactic level.
Papers will focus on (non-exhaustive list):
3. Epistemology: minor(i)sed languages and scientific production Following Catalan-Occitan sociolinguistics, known as “peripheral” sociolinguistics (Lafont, 1997; Boyer,2012), we must question the researcher's behaviours in specific contexts like minorised areas (Agresti, 2020). Who researches minority issues? How? Why? And with whom? Which legitimacy? What place should be given to speakers and linguistic communities in the research process? Does civil society take ownership of the results of academic research? These questions give a range of possibilities for researchers from different backgrounds and geographical areas to work with members of minorised language communities. Concepts such as the “etic/emic” point of view (Sardan, 1998), language planning “from above”, “from below”, or “mid-level”, or movements such as Linguistics for Development (Métangmo-Tatou; Zouogbo (ed.),2022), which is especially developed on the African continent, could be used. In addition, the study of language images in scientific productions and official speeches makes it possible to understand, apart from linguistic incorporation and adaptation processes, how academic production participates, directly or indirectly, in language policy and the development of African languages.
Papers will focus on (non-exhaustive list):
|
Online user: 3 | Privacy | Accessibility |
![]() ![]() |